A commitment agreement under Article 3, paragraph 4, point (a) must be considered to determine its actual or probable negative effect on competition, the only determining factor according to the immediate provision to be calculated taking into account the enumerations provided for in section 19(3) of the Act. It should be noted that the vertical agreements covered in paragraph 3, paragraph 4, referred to in paragraph 4, referred to as c.C.I. do not include consumers, since a producer/service provider and the consumer can never be designated as part of a «production chain» or even operate in «different markets» because a consumer is not involved in production. But the same is not true without dissent. Banks are allowed to take measures to protect their loans and to guarantee the value of their investments, such as the requirement. B of guarantees or guarantees from borrowers. The law frees so-called «traditional banking» practices from its illegality, and is therefore aimed less at limiting banks` lending practices than at ensuring fair and competitive practice. A large portion of the BHCA claims are dismissed. Banks still have some leeway to design credit contracts, but if a bank clearly crosses the limits of decency, the complainant is compensated with three damages. While dealing with the alleged undertaking of the C.C.I.

at least in accordance with the scheme of Section 3 in general and section 3, paragraph 4, in particular, to the point where it recognizes differentiation with respect to the treatment to be taken under the agreement under paragraph 3, paragraph 3(4), is also accepted that «Section 3, paragraph 3) categories are examples of agreements considered to be contrary to Section 3, paragraph 1, and to the Commission it must be considered, in accordance with the law, that these agreements have significant negative effects on competition» and, in the case of an agreement of a nature as provided for in Section 3, paragraph 4, it is necessary to demonstrate that an agreement is likely to significantly affect competition in India. This is a precondition for the right to incomplete under Section 3, without reference to the «master`s position.» In accordance with C.C.I.`s order, an agreement of commitment enters into force when a seller, by a contractual or technological requirement, conditions the sale or lease of a product or service to the agreement reached by the customer to take over a second product or service in the order, C.C.I. acknowledges that the links are not anti-competitive, because «the economic literature indicates that there are pro-competitive reasons. These include the benefits of assembly, improving quality and eliminating price inefficiencies. So it seems clear that C.C.I.